ghtrdyut

 to suspect that employees of companies offering the product description,good mbt shoes, site description on the copy itself,mbt walking shoes reviews, a company in Xi'an who Mr. Long to the grounds of copyright infringement by two former employees and their company to court. Yesterday morning,chung shi walking shoes, in the Xi'an Intermediate People's Court case to trial.

Mr. Long operated a self-control Engineering Co.,buy mbt, Ltd. was established in 1999,buy mbt shoes, mainly engaged in building automation controls design,mbt sale, production,mbt white, sales installation and plumbing equipment,mbt sport, electrical machinery components and accessories sales process. This year in February,cheap mbt shoes, Mr. Long found another company in line with the type of presentation content and product specifications similar to the company,mbt shoes outlet, while the company's two shareholders own the original two employees. In subsequent operations,mbt walking shoes, Mr. Long that his company's business affected by the other party. This year in May,mbt, he and his company,mbt shoes sandals, reported on the other side of the Court.

court yesterday,sells mbt walking shoes, the dragon and his attorney that the defendant company to the plaintiff only on the product name product description had replaced the contents of the website describes the prosecution only deleted two sentences ,discount mbt walking shoes, then the other elements are the same. Mr. Long believes that the other company and companies suspected of infringing his rights to his company's reputation and caused adverse effects on employees,shopping mbt shoes, so the defendant requested the court to eliminate the impact of an apology,mbt trainer, and compensate 200,mbt clearance shoes,000 yuan.

accused Mr. Fang Tian and Mr. Yao said in court,mbt shoes, they are Mr. Zeng Zailong the company over time,mbt tembea shoes, and are responsible for product sales,buy mbt walking shoes, e-commerce and other work,mbt m walk, contact Mr. Long's Product descriptions and website. They believe that the new company Web site describes the content from the Internet,mbt shoes clearance, and then their editors. The defense that the plaintiff side product brochures,sale mbt shoes, website information on the content of these common forms,mbt shoes, a common formula or generic name,mbt shoes sold in us, technology,mbt outlet, not original,mbt shoes, does not have the right of the copyright sense. Also believe that what his company and the prosecution completely different products. Therefore,mbt sandals, the plaintiff asked the court to dismiss the claims.

in court,mbt m walk, the plaintiff Mr. Long did not accept the court's mediation proposal. The plaintiffs believe that their products are the undisputed copyright statement,mbt sandals sale, the other clear violations of the fact that the evidence fully. In view of the original,mbt shoes online, both the accused the evidence is not sufficient,mbt boot, after a two-hour hearing,shoes mbt, the court decided to give both sides a few days to collect on their arguments,mbt clearance, and further evidence.